The paper describes ethical issues involved in the work of a TV journalist. The author – an experienced editor and producer of TV programs – diagnoses the. etyka dziennikarska zadania mediów: role jakie powinny pełnić media epołeczeńetwie reguluje prawo prasowe. wolność to eytuacja kiedy władza. Title, Etyka dziennikarska. Author, Jan Pleszczyński. Publisher, Difin, ISBN, , Length, pages. Export Citation, BiBTeX.
|Published (Last):||23 December 2016|
|PDF File Size:||13.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In other words, journalism scholarship can and should provide journalists with a wealth of accessible knowledge against which to situate their practice, but we need more forums in which to make that happen. And so the defining feature of journalism has faded to the background of what is necessary to know.
In real terms this calls for an increased orientation on the part of journalists toward other forces in the public sphere, for an increased degree of transparency about how journalists work, and for an dziennikarskaa recognition that others may be able to critique journalism better than journalists for the very reason that they look at journalism from its margins.
On the one hand, journalism stretches in various forms across all of dziennjkarska ways in which we come together as a collective. In servicing the public interest by better connecting journalism scholarship and journalism, we hearken back to something Etya Dewey said long ago about education: In fact, a more modulated understanding of journalism and its environment, one that privileges symbiosis more than independence, plodding incremental change more than revolution, is supported by the fact that certain periods emerge as particularly fertile settings for thinking anew about what journalism could be.
Longstanding members of the dziennikatska have maintained durable bonds that exclude multiple kinds of newcomers — such as satiricists or bloggers.
Finally, we have dzienjikarska the diverse global forms of journalism.
Dziennikarz Niezależny? Etyka dziennikarska w praktyce
Where would history be without journalism? Thomas Kuhn was most directly associated with the now somewhat fundamental notion that knowledge depends on consensus building, on developing shared paradigms that name and characterize problems and procedures in ways that are recognized by the group.
What would literature look like?
In demarcating new beginnings? Finally, what does any of this suggest for the public interest? And yet we do not study and teach journalism in a way that reflects this variegated and simultaneous engagement. Implicit here is the fact that journalists need to listen more to academics and minimize their sensitivity to criticisms that academics wield. Proactively fielding developments in the larger environment so as to delay, blunt or even alter the landing of such blows is instrumental for securing a form of journalism that will work more effectively in the public interest.
It offers the tools through which to stead journalism against political attacks which lack historical understanding, to help it better contextualize commercial onslaughts, to offset the hysteria of moral panics which see new technological developments as changing old relationships between young and old or private and public. When coupled with the fact that many journalists cover crisis not as members of news organizations, but as freelancers or solo journalists, offering coverage across platform and news organization, the prevalence of organizational logic seems to be pushing a reality that is less relevant now than it used to be.
Po prostu rozsądek, czyli etyka dziennikarska
So as a system of knowledge, journalism scholarship is uniquely poised to remind journalism to do two basic things. I want to begin with a statement made not long ago by online journalism maven Jeff Jarvis, who proclaimed that given the transformative state of journalism today, the most useful note we can offer budding journalists is the need for adaptability and willingness to embrace change.
The idea of interpretive communities, originally suggested by Stanley Fish and developed in my own work and that of others, helps us situate groups as collectives using shared interpretative strategies that are integral to the knowledge that results. Rather, I suggest we need to tweak journalismchanging it from a community that struggles to sidestep blows as they are launched into one that anticipates as much as it responds. They live in an environment in which economic imperatives and bottom-line pressures force the news to act as a for-profit enterprise, and so journalists are diversified, multi-tasking and multi-skilling in ways that previous generations would not recognize.
It is our role as intellectuals to keep those problems coming. Disciplines come to play in this regard among journalism scholars, where historians, sociologists, political scientists, linguists and cultural analysts all remain in isolated pockets from each other, but we need to mention too how separated are our curricular sequences by medium.
I want to mention three examples in this regard. Why have we not yet put that notion to bed? And how has this affected its capacity to serve the public interest?
Inquiry, then, is not just a cognitive act but a social one too. How much does the world of journalism education reflect that of journalism? Despite an enormous body of academic literature dealing with the values, practices, and impact of journalism, journalism scholars still have not produced a coherent picture of what journalism is.
Etyka dziennikarska – Jan Pleszczyński – Google Books
How can they accommodate change? I want to identify three ways in which this tendency undermines a fuller understanding of how journalism serves the public interest.
What about tweets on twitter? This has produced stubborn enclaves not only across each of the three populations but within them as dziennikarksa. We have not yet learned to define news — we keep repetitively listing its qualities instead.
This notion goes far beyond the work of Kuhn, and it is implicated in scholarship by Durkheim, Foucault, and others — all of whom maintained in different ways that the social group is critical to establishing ways of knowing the world.
While journalists tend to inhabit the news beat, the news organization, or, if you will, the newsroom whatever we mean by that termscholars are well-poised to remind them to keep abreast of other institutional, social, cultural, political, technological and economic impulses awash in their environment. Are mobile phones and cameras bona fide instruments of newsmaking? Not only does this reference comparative journalism in its many permutations, but it orients us to the tensions linking journalism in each location to what goes on at its boundaries.
With journalists increasingly being charged with addressing crisis as the stuff of news, however, we may need to do a better job of recognizing crisis reporting as a mainstay of journalism, particularly because nowhere is the public interest as high on the agenda as in the wars, terrorism and natural disasters that drive periods of crisis.
In large part, the schizophrenic treatment of journalism drives from a persistent gravitation toward group think.